ArticleScientific reports2026
A pilot study reveals plasma metabolomic and lipidomic signatures of mustard lung disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately diagnosing mustard lung disease (MLD) presents a significant challenge due to its intricate nature and overlapping clinical features with other pulmonary conditions. A precise diagnosis is crucial for effective therapeutic management and optimizing patient care. Furthermore, understanding the metabolic shifts induced by sulfur mustard (SM) exposure is critical for elucidating the disease’s mechanisms and developing targeted interventions. This study employed an untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics profiling by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). We analyzed samples from MLD patients (n = 39; 20 mild, 19 moderate severity) and a control group (n = 14). We used multivariate/univariate statistical methods to identify distinguishing metabolites and lipids, and then performed pathway enrichment analysis to uncover the perturbed biochemical pathways. Our results demonstrated significant metabolic disruptions in MLD patients. We identified 16 metabolite panels capable of diagnosing mild MLD against controls, and 22 metabolite panels for moderate MLD versus controls (AUC > 0.85). Additionally, in comparison with the control group, four lipids were detected in the mild MLD group and five in the moderate MLD group (p-value < 0.05). Our findings reveal unique metabolite and lipid profiles and widespread disturbances across various metabolic pathways, including amino acid, butyrate, propanoate metabolism, and carnitine synthesis, which differentiate MLD from controls. This research represents the first investigation into metabolomic and lipidomic signatures that discriminate MLD from control groups using LC-MS. Significant metabolites show promise as candidate biomarkers for MLD diagnosis or prognosis and offer valuable insights for further research into the disease’s pathological mechanisms, pending validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.