ArticleScientific reports2026
Differences in gait biomechanics during level walking between chronic stroke patients with and without depression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression is the most prevalent emotional disorder among post-stroke patients and may influence gait recovery and movement patterns. However, scarce prior research has specifically examined the biomechanical differences in gait between stroke patients with and without depression. This study aimed to explore variations in lower extremity biomechanical parameters during gait based on depression status. A prospective observational design was employed, recruiting 20 chronic stroke patients (post-onset > 6 months) and 10 healthy persons. The Geriatric Depression Scale classified stroke patients into a depressed group (n = 10) and a non-depressed group (n = 10). Participants walked along a seven-meter walkway while a 3D motion analysis system captured sagittal plane biomechanical data from the bilateral hip, knee, and ankle joints. Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, with Mann-Whitney post-hoc comparisons. Findings revealed that the non-depressed group exhibited significantly greater peak generation power at the unaffected hip compared to the depressed group (p = 0.019). Additionally, both stroke groups demonstrated significantly lower peak ankle generation power and reduced maximum knee flexion on the unaffected side compared to the healthy group (p < 0.05). These results suggest that post-stroke gait biomechanics could be different according to psychological factors, emphasizing the need for tailored therapy in the latter rehabilitation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.