ReviewApoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death2026
Breast cancer: taxonomy, distribution analysis, risk factors, predictive biomarkers, and modern treatment method.
Review in Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disease Biomarker Detection Using Fluorescence Polarization Assays: Principles and Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hypoxia-induced mechanism of TNBC promoting tumour cell proliferation through exosomal miRNA.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- SIVA1 Knockdown Drives Aggressive Phenotypes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells while Enhancing Paclitaxel Efficacy.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Nanostructured lipid carriers as co-delivery systems for cancer therapy: Prospects and challenges.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer globally, annually affecting around 2 million women. Situation is getting worse with rising incidence linked to improved detection, risk factors, and enhanced registration systems. Conventional treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy with several limitations are replaced by approaches like immunotherapy, HER2-targeted therapies, and nanotechnology offering improved outcomes, in metastatic cases. Risk factors range from lifestyle (alcohol, obesity, inactivity, smoking), to hormonal imbalance (early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity), to genetic aspects (BRCA1/2, TP53), to environmental determinants as well. Prognostic biomarkers now lead precision medicine: PR, ER, and HER2 stands strong as established pillars, while circulating tumor DNA, and immune-related markers such as PD-L1 offer profound perceptions into treatment response and disease progression. State-of-the-art treatment integrates traditional modalities like surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with targeted and immune-based therapies. Endocrine agents, PARP inhibitors, HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies, and checkpoint inhibitors exemplify the architype swing toward personalized, mechanism-based interventions. The insight underscores the need for twin tactics, leveraging molecular detections for precision oncology while guaranteeing impartial global access to modern therapies. Future progress depends on translational research, and biomarker validation that bridge the gap between innovation and accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41721009What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.