Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721090›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2026

The role of cue transparency in task switching: an SDM-PSI meta-analysis in healthy adults.

Xiaoyu Zheng, Yidan Qiu, Shuting Lin, Wenzhao Deng, Zhizhong Jiang, Bin A Wang, Ruiwang Huang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoyu ZhengSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Yidan QiuSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Shuting LinSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Wenzhao DengSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Zhizhong JiangSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Bin A WangSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Ruiwang HuangSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China. ruiwang.huang@gmail.com.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2023B0303020002National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility, the ability to seamlessly switch between tasks, is essential for daily life in humans. It is commonly assessed using the task-switching paradigm, where the participants need to memorize cue-task associations and retrieve them when they view a cue. The cue transparency, or how clearly a cue is linked to the task, significantly affects cognitive flexibility. Compared to non-transparent cues (non-TCs), which elevate cognitive demands, transparent cues (TCs) lower cognitive load and facilitate smoother task switching. However, the neural responses reflecting the impact of cue transparency on task switching remain insufficiently understood. To address this, we conducted a coordinate-based neuroimaging meta-analysis using seed-based d mapping (SDM-PSI), analyzing 25 fMRI studies to identify neural correlates associated with transparent and non-TCs in task switching. We first identified key regions involved in task switching, including the left supplementary motor area, left precuneus, and bilateral insula. Further analysis revealed that under TCs, the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and inferior parietal gyrus were predominantly engaged, whereas under non-TCs, the precentral gyrus and middle frontal gyrus were primarily recruited. Exploratory analyses clarified how cue transparency affects neural activity, revealing that, compared to TCs, non-TCs were associated with decreased activation in regions such as the left IFG and bilateral precentral gyrus during task switching. Our findings reveal the influence of cue transparency on the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility, thereby advancing our understanding of adaptive task-switching processes.

Indexed as

BrainCuesAdultBrain MappingCognitive FlexibilityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCognitive flexibilitySDM-PSITask cue transparencyTask switching

Identifiers

PMID41721090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.