ArticleAMB Express2026
Rumen bacteria, carcass traits, and meat quality of growing goat fed diets with different levels of Azolla Pinnata.
Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low availability and high prices of concentrate feeds drive the use of sustainable animal feeds, such as Azolla. Azolla is rich in nutrients and bioactive compounds that improve rumen microbial fermentation and animal performance. This study investigated the effect of replacing concentrate feed mixture (CFM) with Azolla pinnata on the rumen bacteria and fermentation, growth performance, and meat quality of growing Damascus (Shami) goats. Twenty-seven growing male goats were used for 153 days to receive three treatments (n = 9): a control group received a non-supplemented diet composed of Berseem hay and CFM (CC); a group received the control diet with 10% Azolla from the CFM (AZ10); and a group received the control diet with 20% Azolla from the CFM (AZ20). Replacing CFM with Azolla increased the diversity of the rumen bacteria, with the enrichment of phyla Bacteroidota and Firmicutes. Azolla enhanced the prevalence of fibrolytic bacteria, Ruminococcus, Butyrivibrio, and Christensenellaceae R-7 group. Total volatile fatty acids (VFA) increased in AZ10 by 39% and 25% compared to groups CC and AZ20, respectively. Growth rate was higher in AZ10 by 35% and 18% compared to CC and AZ20, respectively. Azolla supplementation reduced the fat content of meat and reduced saturated fatty acids of meat by 52% in AZ10 and 21.5% in AZ20 compared to group CC, while it improved the antioxidant capacity and unsaturated fatty acids in meat. Azolla can substitute the conventional feed mixture of growing goats at 10%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.