ReviewGeroScience2026
Plasma-based strategies for systemic rejuvenation: critical perspectives on clinical translation.
Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental models such as heterochronic parabiosis and heterochronic plasma transfer have profoundly advanced our understanding of systemic aging, demonstrating that circulating factors can influence brain, vascular, and immune aging through cell nonautonomous mechanisms. These preclinical models have revealed that both pro-geronic and anti-geronic signals in blood can modulate neuroinflammation, neurovascular health, and cognitive resilience. However, despite their experimental promise, the clinical translation of these findings, particularly through plasma-based interventions in humans, remains fraught with uncertainty. This review critically examines the strengths and limitations of parabiosis-based paradigms as platforms for discovery, contrasts them with early human plasma infusion studies, and evaluates the current biological, medical, and ethical challenges associated with young plasma therapies. Therapeutic plasma exchange has also emerged as a potential rejuvenation strategy, but its mechanisms, efficacy, and longterm safety remain incompletely understood. We argue that future progress in systemic rejuvenation will depend on precise, mechanistically informed interventions-rather than broad, premature applications of plasma therapies, which require further validation through rigorous scientific investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.