ArticleBMC women's health2026
Self-management experiences of vaginal toxicities among patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is a common gynecologic malignancy, and radiotherapy often induces vaginal toxicities such as vaginitis and stenosis, affecting patients’ physical and psychological well-being. Current research focuses mainly on clinical parameters, with limited attention to patients’ self-management experiences. This study explores their self-management practices to inform targeted nursing strategies.
objectiveTo explore the self-management experiences and existing challenges related to vaginal toxicities among patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer, with the aim of informing the development of tailored management strategies for this population.
methodsA descriptive qualitative design was adopted. Using purposive sampling, 18 patients who had received radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer and returned for follow-up at a tertiary cancer hospital in Shanghai from December 2024 to January 2025 were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted, and the data were analyzed using content analysis to extract themes.
resultsThree themes and ten subthemes were identified, including multifaceted challenges in vaginal self-management such as knowledge-related challenges in vaginal self-management, intimacy-related challenges in vaginal self-management, implementation-related challenges in vaginal self-management, environment- and caregiving-related challenges in vaginal self-management; individualized adjustment strategies to cope with self-management dilemmas, including personalized adjustments to vaginal cleansing, self-decision in vaginal dilation management, and self-adjustment in rebuilding intimacy; and internal and external support systems that empower self-management, characterized by the core role of family support, the safeguarding effect of financial support, and emotional connectedness provided by peer support.
conclusionPatients undergoing radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer face multidimensional challenges—cognitive, psychological, and social—in vaginal rehabilitation management. Cognitive biases and poor adherence to vaginal self-management are closely associated with the lack of structured health education. Misconceptions about the disease contribute to sexual psychological distress, while existing nursing care lacks targeted psychological support. Furthermore, insufficient social support, particularly financial burden and limited caregiving capacity, further undermines treatment confidence. Therefore, healthcare providers should establish structured health education systems, strengthen psychological assessment and support, and build comprehensive support networks—including financial, caregiving, and peer support—to enhance patients’ self-management abilities and overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.