Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41721436›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2026

Dietary silicate: a biogenic strategy to enhance growth, gut health, and nutrient utilization in finishing pigs through low-carbon diets.

Wei Han Zhao, Seung Jin Yun, In Ho Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei Han Zhao *Department of Animal Biotechnology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31187, Korea.
Seung Jin Yun *Department of Animal Biotechnology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31187, Korea.
In Ho KimDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31187, Korea. inhokim@dankook.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-RS-2023-00275307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-carbon feeding is an effective strategy to reduce nutrient losses and environmental emissions in swine production. High-protein (HP) diets increase nitrogen (N) excretion and ammonia (NH3) emissions, whereas low-protein (LP) diets improve N utilization but may impair growth performance. Silicate (SIL) has been reported to enhance digestion and reduce harmful gas emissions; however, its efficacy under different dietary protein levels remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of SIL supplementation in HP and LP diets to provide evidence for efficient and low-carbon pig production.

methodsA 10-wk feeding trial was conducted using 200 pigs [Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire)] with an initial body weight of 55.40 ± 3.36 kg. Pigs were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design, with 10 replicates per treatment and 5 pigs per pen (2 gilts and 3 barrows). The experiment followed a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, consisting of two dietary protein levels: HP and LP diets, with 2% lower crude protein (CP), and two levels of SIL supplementation (0 or 0.1%).

resultsThe results demonstrated that dietary supplementation with 0.1% SIL significantly improved growth performance, as indicated by increased average daily gain (ADG) and reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.05). SIL supplementation also enhanced the digestibility of dry matter (DM), N, and energy (E), while reducing moisture digestibility (P < 0.05). In addition, SIL significantly decreased fecal emissions of NH₃, hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), and carbon dioxide (CO₂) and improved fecal consistency scores at wk 10 (P < 0.05), indicating its potential to mitigate environmental emissions. Regarding physiological responses, SIL supplementation increased white blood cell (WBC) counts and blood glucose concentrations (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), while reducing serum creatinine and cortisol levels (P < 0.05), suggesting improved metabolic status and reduced physiological stress. In terms of meat quality, SIL enhanced muscle water-holding capacity (WHC), reduced drip loss, and improved tissue cohesiveness and elasticity (P < 0.05). Moreover, SIL supplementation increased the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids and improved the ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids, indicating a favorable modification of lipid composition. Dietary protein level also exerted significant main effects. LP diets reduced CO₂ emissions and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations (P < 0.05), reflecting a lower N metabolic burden and reduced carbon emissions. No significant interaction between dietary protein level and SIL supplementation was observed for the measured parameters. Fecal microbiota analysis showed that SIL supplementation was associated with alterations in gut microbial composition, characterized by an increased relative abundance of beneficial taxa, including Lactobacillus and members of the Lactobacillaceae family. These microbial shifts may contribute to improved intestinal health and more favorable fermentation characteristics, thereby supporting the observed reductions in harmful gas emissions.

conclusionDietary inclusion of 0.1% SIL represents an effective nutritional strategy for enhancing growth performance and nutrient utilization in finishing pigs, while supporting a low-carbon feeding model. By improving gut health and reducing environmental emissions, SIL demonstrates strong potential as a functional feed additive for promoting both productivity and environmental sustainability in pig production.

Indexed as

Fecal microbiotaGas emissionsGrowth performanceLow-carbon dietsMeat qualitySilicate

Identifiers

PMID41721436
PMCPMC12937523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.