ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2026
National and Subnational Models of Care That Support Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National and Subnational Models of Care That Support Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2020, the World Health Assembly called on countries to reorient their models of care (MOCs) toward primary health care (PHC). This study's objectives were to (a) describe common use of the concept of MOC; and (b) identify implemented MOCs and their components that support PHC at national and subnational levels. A scoping review charted data on national and subnational level MOCs from literature reviews in PubMed and Global Index Medicus databases and WHO publications. Qualitative interviews about current MOCs were conducted with national-level health planners in seven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries. 2189 abstracts were screened and 98 papers included. Few papers explicitly defined 'model of care'; most instead referred to particular models of care and their components, implicitly including processes of care, organization of providers and management of services. Seventy-eight papers described small subnational (e.g., district or municipal) MOCs focused on care groups or conditions. Twelve papers and all interviewees described national or large subnational (e.g., provincial or regional) MOCs intended to prioritize primary care services, service integration and people-centred service delivery. Key components included: strengthening primary care capacity to coordinate and deliver services; implementing multidisciplinary, team-based service delivery; building robust linkages (e.g., referral, communication and transportation) across all care levels; designing pathways to efficiently guide people's journeys through a health system; and ensuring longitudinal health care coordination. Findings suggest that reorienting a national MOC toward PHC is facilitated by explicit articulation of the intended MOC and practical, coordinated planning for its incremental implementation, financing and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.