ArticleScientific reports2026
Accurately identifying cirrhosis and its complications to create the novel statewide Indiana digital cirrhosis registry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Administrative datasets are important for cirrhosis research but limited by suboptimal cirrhosis identification. We developed and validated algorithms to accurately identify cirrhosis and its complications in real-world, statewide dataset. From 2017 to 2020 Indiana Patient Care Network data, 15,636 records were grouped by combinations of code and lab criteria (group A: cirrhosis codes, B: FIB-4/APRI criteria, C: cirrhosis complication codes, D: code/lab for liver disease). Diagnoses were confirmed by chart review in 4.5% of 15,636 records. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for various algorithms which were externally validated in hepatology clinic (n = 1,039) and emergency department-based cirrhosis cohorts (n = 2,124). Charts meeting criteria for group A and at least one other group (“AX”, e.g., ABC) had an overall PPV of 86%. Highest PPVs were seen in ACD and ABCD and confirmed during external validation: 88% and 97% (hepatology cohort), 79% and 93% (ED cohort). Without complication codes, ABD showed strong PPVs: 86%(internal), 92%(hepatology), 72%(ED). ICD-10-based definitions alone were suboptimal for complications: ascites (57%), hepatic encephalopathy (HE:55%). PPV for HE was improved with addition of medications but remained < 80%. Taken together, we provide algorithms to identify both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis in real-world data. Using the “AX” algorithm, we created the statewide Indiana Digital Cirrhosis Cohort to support future research across cirrhosis stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.