Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723222›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Plasma brain-derived tau: analytical and clinical validation of the first commercial immunoassay.

Michel N Nafash, Sarah E Svirsky, Xuemei Zeng, Yijun Chen, Julia K Kofler, Ann D Cohen, David O Okonkwo, Oscar L Lopez, Ava M Puccio, Thomas K Karikari

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michel N NafashDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sarah E SvirskyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Xuemei ZengDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yijun ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julia K KoflerAlzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann D CohenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Oscar L LopezAlzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ava M PuccioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Thomas K KarikariDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. karikaritk@upmc.edu.

Funding

Plasma brain-derived tau: a novel Alzheimer’s disease-type neurodegeneration biomarker with potential to complete the AT(N) scheme in bloodR01AG083874 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Thomas K Karikari · 2023 to 2026
$14.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-derived tau (BD-tau) is a promising blood-based biomarker for neurodegeneration/brain injury in neurodegenerative and acute neurological disorders. However, widespread use is hampered by lack of commercial assays. Using the Simoa® HD-X analyzer, we evaluated the first commercial research-use only BD-tau Advantage PLUS assay’s robustness, precision, spike recovery, specificity, dilution linearity, and limit of detection. Matrix effect was examined by comparing BD-tau levels in n = 48 plasma/serum and n = 20 plasma/CSF sample pairs. Clinical performance was examined in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) cohort. Twenty repeated measurements of three plasma samples gave intra- and inter-plate coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 7.24%. Analytically, BD-tau concentrations decreased linearly up to 16-fold dilution, spike recovery was 86–96%, and signals were highly specific to the CNS-abundant recombinant tau-441 but not the peripherally-enriched “big-tau” isoform. Moreover, signals were stable for up to four freeze/thaw cycles. Furthermore, there were significant correlations between plasma/serum (r = 0.8392; p < 0.0001) and plasma/CSF (r = 0.6150; p = 0.0039) pairs. Finally, plasma BD-tau was elevated in severe-acute TBI vs. chronic-mixed TBI and unaffected controls (p < 0.0001; AUC = 0.9986, and p < 0.0001; AUC = 1.000, respectively). In severe-acute TBI patients, plasma BD-tau was correlated with plasma p-tau217 (r = 0.5761, p = 0.0005), NfL (r = 0.8910, p = 0.0001), and GFAP (r = 0.5424, p = 0.0011). CSF BD-tau and CSF p-tau217 were strongly correlated (r = 0.9667, p = 0.0002). BD-tau Advantage PLUS produces robust brain-derived tau-specific readings that demonstrate utility in detecting severe-acute TBI.

Indexed as

BrainBrain Injuries, Traumatictau ProteinsAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseAnalytical validationBlood-based biomarkersBrain-derived tauClinical validationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41723222
PMCPMC13021937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.