ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Contextual aspects of implementing an intervention to mitigate podoconiosis-related stigma in Musanze district, Rwanda.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hematological profiles and preventive-practice characteristics among patients with podoconiosis: A case-control study in Musanze District, Rwanda.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective interventions rely on understanding complex contextual aspects of care. We focused on health promotion intervention that increases on podoconiosis awareness to mitigate podoconiosis-related stigma. We applied context and implementation of complex interventions (CICI) framework to evaluate the contextual factors for an existing health promotion intervention aimed to reduce podoconiosis-related stigma in Musanze district, Rwanda.
methodsWe applied an exploratory mixed-methods design to evaluate the contextual domains, which included epidemiological, geographical, political, legal, ethical, socio-economic and socio-cultural conducted from October 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data was collected through a household survey with 48 patients and 329 unaffected people. While, qualitative data was obtained through 36 in-depth interviews (24 with people affected with podoconiosis and 12 community members), six key informant interviews and four focus group discussions, six field observation visits and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed using Stata version 17 software. The qualitative data were managed with NVivo version 11 software.
resultsKey successes within the sociocultural domain were improved early diagnosis whereby three-quarters sought care at a nearby health centre. Increased podoconiosis awareness among people affected with podoconiosis and community members with response differences: walking barefoot on volcanic soil (97.9% vs. 44.4%), witchcraft (35.4% vs. 24.4%) and hereditary (35.4% vs. 27.4%). Levels of experienced enacted stigma such as being insulted about condition (66.7%), excluded from social events (53.2%) or church (35.4%) were slightly lower than those of felt stigma manifestations such as unsatisfying life (83.3%), don’t want to meet with other people (68.8%) and do not deserve to live (62.5%). The politico-legal domains were initiation of NTD programmes, effective teamwork but relied on external funds. Challenges from geographic and economic domains were hilly terrain, long travel distances, denial of loans and discrimination against female patients, respectively.
conclusionThe CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key contextual factors that might affect implementation of the intervention in a new environment. We suggest that when implementing new programs consideration should be paid to sociocultural, economic, political, geographic context and how they interact and influence one another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.