Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723919›Full record

ArticleVaccine2026

XBB 1.5 monovalent booster vaccination stimulates oral mucosal and systemic immune responses in healthy adults.

Nada Deraz, Michael Payne, Ellen See, Vaishnavi Ragavapuram, Jurgen Bosch, Christopher L King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nada DerazCase Western Reserve University, United States; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Rainbow Babies and Children, United States. Electronic address: nada.deraz@uhhospitals.org.
Michael PayneCase Western Reserve University, United States. Electronic address: mcp9@case.edu.
Ellen SeeCase Western Reserve University, United States.
Vaishnavi RagavapuramCase Western Reserve University, United States.
Jurgen BoschCase Western Reserve University, United States. Electronic address: jxb745@case.edu.
Christopher L KingCase Western Reserve University, United States; Veterans Affairs Administration, United States. Electronic address: cxk21@case.edu.

Funding

Early Drivers of Humoral Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 InfectionsU01CA260539 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KING, CHRISTOPHER L · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA260539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe FDA approved the first monovalent XBB1.5 booster vaccine in September 2023. However, whether this vaccine stimulates mucosal immune responses in the oropharynx, especially neutralizing antibodies, remains understudied.

methodsWe analyzed serum and saliva samples from 28 participants, collected one week before and two to three weeks after the XBB1.5 mRNA vaccination, for neutralizing and binding antibodies to Wuhan and XBB1.5 Spike (S) protein.

resultsWe observed a 2.9-fold increase in Wuhan and a 5.0-fold rise in XBB1.5 serum neutralization titers after mRNA vaccination, which correlated with increased binding antibody levels against the S protein variants in serum. We also examined saliva to assess oral mucosal immune responses to vaccination. Vaccination caused a 1.7-fold increase in ACE2 neutralization in saliva against XBB1.5 (p < 0.0001) and a 1.4-fold increase against Wuhan (p = 0.03). This rise in neutralizing antibody levels in saliva was not associated with the number and timing of previous COVID-19 infections, vaccination status, vaccine type, age, sex, or increases in S-specific IgG in either saliva or serum. Individuals with the largest increase in XBB1.5 neutralization in saliva tended to show a greater rise in S-specific sIgA levels. Depletion of salivary IgA1 or IgG after vaccination revealed that IgA1 was mainly responsible for the increase in ACE2 blocking activity (average reduction in blocking activity with IgA1 depletion = 68%, range 58-81%) compared to IgG (average reduction = 27%, range 0-71%).

conclusionsThe XBB1.5 monovalent vaccine boosts neutralizing antibody levels in blood and mucous membranes, with the largest increase observed against the XBB1.5 variant. This likely reflects the enhancement of cross-reactive antibodies influenced by prior exposure and hybrid immunity, rather than the production of entirely XBB1.5-specific responses. Improved oral mucosal immune responses may reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection and severe illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunity, MucosalImmunization, SecondaryMouth MucosaAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalivaSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusYoung AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2 inhibitionCOVID-19Mucosal immune responseNeutralizing antibodiesPseudovirus neutralization assaySecretory IgA (sIgA)Spike (S) proteinSystemic immune responseXBB1.5 monovalent booster

Identifiers

PMID41723919
PMCPMC13345680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.