ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2026
Clinical relevance of mosaic variants detected by exome sequencing.
Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMosaic variants represent a significant but underrecognized contributor to human disease such as cancer and immune diseases. Despite advances in genetic diagnostics, mosaic variant detection remains challenging as a result of low variant allele fractions, tissue specificity, and clinical heterogeneity.
objectiveWe investigated the prevalence, diagnostic impact, and clinical relevance of mosaic variants in participants with immune disorders.
methodsExome sequencing of blood and/or saliva was performed in 2655 participants, including 2064 affected participants. Mosaic variants were detected using two algorithms, LoFreq2 and Mutect2. A subset of the detected variants was orthogonally validated. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to assess the clinical significance of these variants.
resultsMosaic variants associated with immune disorders contributed to a molecular diagnosis in 29 (1.4%) of 2064 affected participants. Notably, 9 (31%) of 29 of diagnostic variants were missed by standard germline analysis as a result of low variant allele fractions. Clinically relevant parental mosaicism was ascertained in two families. Enrichment of mosaic variants was observed in clonal hematopoiesis-related genes driven by older age and GATA2 deficiency, with prognostic implications for hematologic disorders. Finally, chemotherapy drug resistance variants in NRAS, KRAS, and IDH2 were identified, demonstrating the potential for mosaic variant detection to inform treatment strategies.
conclusionMosaic variants contribute significantly to the molecular diagnosis and prognosis of immune and hematologic disorders and are missed by typical germline variant-calling workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.