Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41724752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Exploring the impact of cultural opportunities and cultural perception on spatial equity of pocket parks in Guangzhou Liwan old town.

Ce Xu, Suqi Zhu, Qiwei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ce XuGuangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Suqi ZhuGuangdong Urban-Rural Planning and Design Research Institute Technology Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510290, China.
Qiwei SunGuangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510060, China. qiweisun_gzpi@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No.2023YFC3805501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social equity and environmental justice are essential for achieving sustainable urbanisation in developing countries. In densely populated and land-scarce areas, pocket parks provide a practical solution for increasing green space supply. This research establishes an opportunity measurement method based on cultural coefficients and a cultural perception evaluation system combining the Semantic Differential Method (SD) and the integration of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the entropy method. Using 104 pocket parks in Liwan Old Town as case studies, the feasibility of these methods was validated. Lorenz curves, Gini coefficients, location entropy, and spatial autocorrelation analysis were employed to compare the overall spatial equity and spatial distribution patterns of cultural opportunities and cultural perception. Results indicate that the spatial equity of cultural perception is higher than that of cultural opportunities, revealing a mismatch between the spatial supply of cultural resources and their experiential realization. In the old town with distinct local characteristics, pocket parks provide abundant cultural opportunities, but their cultural perception is constrained by park construction and maintenance conditions. This research explores the role and impact of local culture in achieving green equity. The findings can be applied to similar old towns with rich local contexts to identify development potential in the early stages of pocket park planning and design, providing a reference for future decision-making.

Indexed as

Cultural perceptionEvaluation frameworkLocal culturePocket parksSpatial equitySpatial mismatchSupply–demand relationship

Identifiers

PMID41724752
PMCPMC13022204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.