ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Erythrocytosis after SGLT2 inhibitor initiation and anticoagulated outcomes in atrial fibrillation: a real-world analysis with counterfactual modeling.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundErythrocytosis has emerged as a hematologic response to sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapy, yet its occurrence and potential impact on bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulant therapy remain unknown.
methodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study using the Tianjin Health and Medical Data Platform, including adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants from 2011 to 2024. In Part 1, employing a new-user design with a stratified pseudo-time strategy, SGLT2 inhibitor initiation was compared with non-use for incident erythrocytosis, estimated by Poisson regression to calculate incidence rate ratios. In Part 2, restricted to SGLT2 inhibitor users, erythrocytosis served as the exposure for thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes, analyzed with Fine–Gray and Cox models. Active comparator analyses, propensity score matching, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and counterfactual mediation and decision modeling tested robustness and individualized treatment thresholds.
resultsAmong 47,401 eligible patients with AF receiving anticoagulant therapy, a stratified pseudo-time strategy was applied to minimize immortal time bias, identifying 39,190 patients for analysis (mean age 72.5 ± 9.7 years; 48.1% female). Of these, 6,697 were SGLT2 inhibitor users. Erythrocytosis occurred in 11.3% of users compared with 3.1% of non-users within 6 ± 2 months, corresponding to an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 3.85 (95% CI 2.78–5.31). In the full follow-up, erythrocytosis was independently associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events (Model 5 aHR 2.34, 95% CI 1.39–3.94; p = 0.001) but this was not statistically significant for bleeding (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 0.81–2.49; p = 0.22). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results across age, sex, kidney function, and anticoagulant type. Mediation and counterfactual analyses indicated that the hemoglobin rise acted primarily as a risk marker rather than a causal mediator.
conclusionsSGLT2 inhibitor-associated erythrocytosis is a frequent hematological response in patients with AF receiving anticoagulant therapy and marks a phenotype predisposed to thromboembolism rather than bleeding. Based on counterfactual mediation analysis, the rise in hemoglobin levels likely represents a risk marker rather than a causal mediator, warranting early monitoring for personalized risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.