Evidence mapPaperPMID 41724943Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Animal models for critical-sized long-bone defects and long-bone non-union: a scoping review.

Nader Maai, Arthur Meuris, FRI Research Group Basel, Esther Wehrle, Willem-Jan Metsemakers, Claudia Siverino, Mario Morgenstern

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nader MaaiAO Research Institute Davos, 7270, Davos, Switzerland. NaderMaai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-1925
Arthur MeurisDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3231-8498
FRI Research Group Basel
Esther WehrleAO Research Institute Davos, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-7342
Willem-Jan MetsemakersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-9093
Claudia SiverinoAO Research Institute Davos, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-1922
Mario MorgensternAO Research Institute Davos, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-0731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical-sized long-bone defects and non-unions are among the most challenging complications in fracture care, as they lack the capacity for spontaneous healing and often lead to prolonged disability and repeated surgical intervention. Their complex aetiology involves mechanical, biological, and systemic factors that make consistent clinical management difficult. Preclinical animal models remain crucial for understanding the biological and mechanical factors underlying bone repair. This scoping review summaries existing animal models of long-bone defects and non-unions and identifies methodological gaps affecting reproducibility and clinical translation.

methodsA comprehensive literature search across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and BIOSIS) was performed. Preclinical in vivo animal studies with experimentally induced long-bone defects and non-unions that were published prior to October 2024 were included in the search. The following parameters were collected: animal species, number of animals, definitions of "non-union" and "long-bone defect", specific bone studied, experimental setup (e.g., unilateral or bilateral model), method of defect creation, fixation technique, defect size, defect filling, additional therapeutic interventions, infection, experiment duration, non-union rate, and the employed surgical approach (single-stage or multi-stage).

resultsA total of 117 studies were included for analysis, whereby 54 studies addressed non-union and 63 focused on long-bone defects. Amongst the included studies, the most frequently investigated species were rats (40.2%), mice (21.4%), sheep (15.4%), and dogs (11.1%). Definitions for non-union and critical-sized defects varied widely, with the most commonly applied method determining non-union being radiographic analysis (74.4%) and time-based criteria (35%). The fixation methods applied were intramedullary nails (35%), external fixators (22.2%), and plates (28.2%), with the reported average experimental duration across studies of 116 ± 101 days.

conclusionPreclinical models for critical-sized defects and non-union remain highly heterogeneous, limiting reproducibility and translational relevance. Clear, species-appropriate definitions, improved reporting of defect and fixation parameters, and alignment of study duration with species-specific healing dynamics are essential to strengthen comparability. While model selection should remain driven by the research question, greater standardisation and the development of biologically faithful non-union models are needed to improve the clinical predictive value of preclinical research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFracture HealingFractures, UnunitedAnimalsDogsSheepBone regenerationFracture healingMethodological standardisationPreclinical researchTranslational orthopaedics

Identifiers

PMID41724943
PMCPMC13032318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.