Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725123›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Vision Fine-Tunes Predictions of Bimanual Self-Touch.

Noa Cemeljic, Konstantina Kilteni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Vision Fine-Tunes Predictions of Bimanual Self-Touch.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noa CemeljicDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0002-2222-2774
Konstantina KilteniDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6887-6434

Funding

Åke Wibergs Foundation M20-0038European Research Council 101039152Karolinska Institutet 2022-01634Swedish Research Council 2019-01909Swedish Research Council 2024-00906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-touch is attenuated compared to external touch due to internal forward models predicting the somatosensory consequences of our movements. These self-touch predictions are continuously updated during the movement using the available sensory input, resulting in a precise temporal tuning of somatosensory perception. However, the contributions of different sensory inputs, such as vision, to the predictions of the forward models and thus the resulting modulation of somatosensory perception remain unknown. In this pre-registered study, participants discriminated forces applied to their left index or ring finger during a reaching movement of the right hand towards the left hand, performed both with and without visual input. When vision was available, somatosensory perception was gradually attenuated during the movement and peaked at the time of self-touch, replicating our previous findings. Without visual input, this temporal tuning was reduced, as somatosensory perception was more uniformly, rather than gradually, attenuated throughout the movement. Our findings thus indicate that vision increases the precision of self-touch predictions, thereby fine-tuning the temporal modulation of somatosensory perception during movements to self-touch.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceTouchTouch PerceptionVision, OcularVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleFingersHandHumansMaleMovementYoung Adultinternal forward modelsself‐touch attenuationsomatosensory modulationvision

Identifiers

PMID41725123
PMCPMC12926622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.