Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725136›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: An Overview of the Current State of Fusion Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: Is Fusion Necessary?

Federico Landriel, Fabio Cofano, Santiago Matías Hem, Syed Muhammed Karim, Ankit I Mehta, Ori Barzilai, Nicolas Dea, Alessandro Gasbarrini, C Rory Goodwin, Ilya Laufer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Federico LandrielNeurosurgical Department, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fabio CofanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Santiago Matías HemNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Syed Muhammed KarimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown Cancer Institute at MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ankit I MehtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6931-6095
Ori BarzilaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nicolas DeaCombined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alessandro GasbarriniDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
C Rory GoodwinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine Division, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-2751
Ilya LauferDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jeremy ReynoldsDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Jorrit-Jan VerlaanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Charles G FisherCombined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cordula NetzerDepartment of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-373X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignLiterature review with clinical recommendations.ObjectiveProviding a clear and concise overview based on the of key literature and consensus expert opinion on spinal fusion following stabilization for spine metastases and offer actionable recommendations on when to fuse and not fuse in this patient population.MethodsKey articles from the published literature on spinal metastases treated with stabilization followed by fusion were reviewed, and clinical recommendations were formulated. The recommendations are categorized as either strong or conditional based on an assessment of methodological quality and expert opinion. This assessment considers factors such as experience, risks, burdens, costs, patient values, and circumstances.ResultsFour articles were selected by practicing spinal oncology surgeons and each was evaluated for its methodological strength and its scientific evidence.ConclusionFusion rarely influences clinical outcomes in metastatic spine surgery. Treatment should prioritize mechanical stability, pain control, functional preservation, and timely continuation of oncologic therapy rather than pursuing bony arthrodesis. Fusion should be considered exclusively in select long-surviving patients, however routine attempts to enhance fusion or delay adjuvant therapy are not justified.[Formula: see text].

Indexed as

bone graftsfusion ratehardware failureliterature reviewoutcomepseudarthrosisspinal metastasessurgical site infectionwound healing complications

Identifiers

PMID41725136
PMCPMC12929080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.