Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725218›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2026

Beyond BMI: The Impact of the New Lancet Commission Diagnostic Criteria on Prevalence of Obesity in the United States.

Jennifer H Hwang, Neda Laiteerapong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer H HwangSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4199-6690
Neda LaiteerapongSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

NIH HHSUniversity of Chicago
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compared population characteristics and overall US prevalence of obesity over time using the BMI criteria and the 2025 Lancet Commission criteria (i.e., the Excess Adiposity criteria).

methodsWe analyzed data from 58,053 adults aged ≥ 20 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2023. The Excess Adiposity criteria incorporated BMI, waist circumference, waist to hip and waist to height ratios, and body fat percentage to identify obesity, which was subclassified as preclinical or clinical based on organ dysfunction and activity limitations. Survey-weighted estimates were calculated to produce nationally representative trends.

resultsBy BMI criteria, obesity prevalence increased from 31% (58.8 million) in 1999-2004 to 43% (101.3 million) in 2021-2023. By Excess Adiposity criteria, prevalence was higher and increasing from 51% (94.7 million) to 61% (143.9 million). The prevalence of clinical obesity is high due to a large number of people meeting criteria for organ dysfunction and/or activity limitations.

conclusionsUsing the Excess Adiposity criteria to define obesity classifies nearly three in five US adults as having obesity, revealing substantial clinical, public health, and policy implications. The new criteria improve identification of individuals at risk but will require further strategies to achieve equitable, effective, and sustainable obesity prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexObesityAdiposityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceUnited StatesWaist CircumferenceWaist-Hip RatioYoung Adultbody mass indexexcess adiposityLancet Commissionobesity

Identifiers

PMID41725218
PMCPMC13250740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.