Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725576›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

Communicative Justice in Later Life: A Critical Discourse Study and Bioethics-of-Vulnerability Analysis of Older Adults' Primary Care in Spain.

Pablo Martínez-Angulo, María José Millán-Eslava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo Martínez-AnguloDepartment of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba (UCO), Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-2210
María José Millán-EslavaDepartment of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba (UCO), Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults' experiences of primary care are shaped not only by service capacity but by the language and routines through which access and care are organised. Using a qualitative Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) approach informed by the bioethics of vulnerability, we analysed interviews and focus groups with 12 community-dwelling older adults living alone in southern Spain. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) linked micro-level talk to meso-level scripts and macro-rationales. Participants portrayed appointment systems and digital channels as gatekeeping devices that shifted agency to family 'brokers', with telephone and app-based booking often producing situational-or, after repeated failures, pathogenic-vulnerability. In consultations, haste, technical jargon and the 'doctor-patient-computer' triad curtailed understanding; age-based commonplaces (e.g., 'what do you expect at your age') legitimised truncated responses; discontinuity with physicians contrasted with nurse-led clarity and vigilance. Emotional sequelae included strategic silence and reduced help-seeking. We argue that vulnerability here is produced rather than intrinsic and can be mitigated via human-assisted booking parity, plain-language and teach-back as safety practices, continuity-by-design, and explicit de-ageing of triage and policy scripts. Communicative justice emerges as a core condition for equitable care in later life.

Indexed as

CommunicationPrimary Health CareSocial JusticeVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSpainageismCritical Discourse Studiesethicsolder adultspatient–clinician communicationprimary carevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41725576
PMCPMC12926928

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.