ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
AI expectation violations and learner engagement in EFL contexts: a cognitive-affective recovery model.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling AI trust and AI self-efficacy in AI-assisted EFL classrooms: the role of basic psychological needs in classroom engagement.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly deployed in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) education, offering adaptive feedback, automated evaluation, and personalized learning pathways. However, existing research overwhelmingly emphasizes AI adoption and performance benefits, while largely overlooking what happens when AI systems fail to meet learner expectations and how learners recover from such failures. As a result, the cognitive-affective processes through which expectation violations translate into disengagement-or are mitigated through recovery-remain under-theorized and empirically unexplored. Addressing this gap, this study proposes and tests a cognitive-affective recovery model of learner engagement in AI-supported EFL contexts. Drawing on Expectation Violation Theory (EVT), Cognitive Appraisal Theory (CAT), and Digital Divide/Resilience Theory, the model explains how expectation violations influence engagement and how cognitive reappraisal and trust recovery mediate this relationship, while digital grit conditions learners' ability to persist following setbacks. A two-wave survey of 298 Chinese EFL learners from urban and rural settings, including both university students and private institute learners, was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results show that expectation violations significantly reduce learner engagement, but perceived AI adaptivity narrows the adaptation gap and activates recovery processes. Cognitive reappraisal and trust recovery emerged as key mediating mechanisms, while digital grit moderated critical pathways by sustaining engagement under adverse conditions. By shifting the focus from AI success narratives to failure-and-recovery dynamics, this study advances theory on AI-learner interaction and offers practical guidance for designing resilient, trust-sensitive, and equity-oriented AI systems in language education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.