ArticleCanadian liver journal2025
Trends in hepatitis C care in Canada's provincial and territorial prisons from 2020 to 2024.
Article in Canadian liver journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: National hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination efforts are contingent on the provision of care in prisons. This study aimed to assess HCV care practices in Canada's provincial/territorial prisons in 2024, comparing trends from 2020 to 2024. Methods: From June 14 to October 31, 2024, one representative per prison health care team (excluding Nunavut) completed a web-based survey. The outcomes of interest were HCV screening, access to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), linkage to care following release, and access to opioid agonist therapies (OAT) and prison-based needle and syringe programs (PNSPs). Non-nominal data were aggregated by province, and descriptive statistical analyses were used to report outcomes. Results: The survey was completed by 88/94 (94%) prisons. In total, 85 prisons offered HCV screening. On-demand (15/85; 18%), risk-based (1/85; 1%), and opt-in (9/85; 11%) screening declined since 2020, while opt-out (15/85; 18%) and combination (45/85; 53%) screening increased. Reflex RNA testing occurred in over half (46/85; 54%) of prisons. DAAs were offered in 74/88 (84%) prisons, and 65/74 (88%) provided the remainder of DAAs at release to facilitate treatment completion. In 2024, the majority (78/88; 89%) of prisons facilitated continuity of care following release. OAT was available in most prisons (83/88; 94%), and in 2024, more prisons offered OAT for people who had never been on OAT (73/83; 88%). Not a single prison had implemented PNSPs. Conclusions: While there were improvements in prison-based HCV care from 2020 to 2024, HCV care was still not equivalent to that in the community in 2024, jeopardizing HCV elimination efforts both in prisons and in surrounding communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.