ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
Development of a rule-based natural language processing algorithm to extract sleep information in pediatric primary care patients with a sleep diagnosis.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: The current study employed natural language processing (NLP) to capture multidimensional and transdiagnostic information in pediatric clinical notes. We present a novel, low-resource sleep vocabulary that can be applied to notes to identify pediatric sleep-related mentions automatically. Methods: Using a combination of existing medical sleep ontologies, interviews with clinicians, and examination of clinical note narratives, we develop a novel vocabulary of pediatric sleep-related terms and phrases that covers both technical terms, abbreviations, and colloquial keywords used in describing pediatric sleep health. We compare our vocabulary against a set of manually annotated clinical notes to determine the effectiveness of our vocabulary for identifying notes with pediatric sleep-related mentions. Results: Our vocabulary was able to correctly identify clinical notes with pediatric sleep-related mentions with a recall of 0.992 and a precision of 0.852. Most false positives occurred in notes that either explicitly stated no sleep issues or contained text unrelated to patient sleep health (e.g. medication side effects). Among the text spans annotated as sleep-related mentions, 77.1% include at least one keyword from our vocabulary. Conclusions: Our vocabulary showed excellent performance for identifying pediatric sleep-related mentions at the clinical note level and decent performance for identifying the specific text containing patient mentions. Our low-resource vocabulary, which can be deployed in almost any compute environment, can serve as an identifying first pass over clinical notes to identify which notes or note sections should be further processed by more advanced models or manual annotation review to identify more narrow mentions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.