ArticleDigital health
Emerging trends in endoscopy and virtual reality from 1991 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising technology in endoscopic procedures, though the research landscape remains fragmented across multiple domains. This study aims to analyze the evolution and current state of VR applications in endoscopic medicine through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Publications from 1991 to 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection using a systematic search strategy. Multiple bibliometric tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix," were utilized to analyze publication trends, research collaborations, and emerging themes. Results: A total of 540 articles were included, showing consistent growth, with peak publication activity identified in 2019. The greatest number of publications were from the United States (n = 152), followed by Japan (n = 43) and China (n = 41). The University of Toronto emerged as the most prolific institution in terms of publication volume in this field. Author De Suvranu had the highest total publications and fractional publication count. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis provides the first comprehensive mapping of endoscopic VR research, revealing distinct research clusters and emerging trends. Key priorities include standardized assessment protocols and integrating mixed-reality surgical guidance into endoscopic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.