ArticleHealth science reports2026
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Health Information Management Systems in Facilitating Quality Healthcare Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: HIMS was purposefully implemented to generate high-quality data to help manage and track patients' health status and support healthcare decisions such as clinical care and resource allocation. In this vein, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HIMS in facilitating quality healthcare service by assessing professionals' perception of HIMS, its impact on healthcare quality and feedback on HIMS satisfaction and areas for improvement. Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional design to collect data from 480 healthcare professionals from the Directorate of University Health Services-University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital and Ewim Polyclinic via semi-structured questionnaires. A thorough quantitative data analysis approach was employed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 2.6. The results presented the descriptive and influential statistics (Chi-square test of independence), with Results: Healthcare professionals are acquainted with HIMS and its usage in their facilities. About 85% of the participants rated the system's user-friendliness as good and excellent. Perception of the essentiality of HIMS interoperability is associated with occupation type (χ Conclusion: The overall sentiment towards HIMS is favorable, indicating a successful adoption and integration into daily operations. HIMS has proven to be the necessary technology needed to fill gaps in care delivery and transform healthcare service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.