ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Translating Nursing Data into Computational Metrics: An Evaluation Guideline for Inpatient Intravenous and Subcutaneous Insulin Management.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A challenge in utilizing electronic health record data for artificial intelligence models is contextualization, including understanding differences between missing data and missed care. Our team aims to develop knowledge graphs and computational models that account for these contexts, such as when data is missing (nurses being unable to document), but acceptable nursing care was delivered. We developed evaluation guidelines for intravenous and subcutaneous insulin management to establish a binary variable derived from EHR data representing minimally acceptable safe and quality nursing care for use in computational modeling. These guidelines were developed by our nurse informatics team based on best practices and validated by three nurse subject matter experts. The resulting evaluation guidelines are agnostic to institutional policies and focus on evaluating minimally acceptable safe and quality levels of care to inform inferences about missing data versus missed nursing care. Future work includes data-driven validations and expanding to other clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726466PMC12919408What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.