ArticleACS omega2026
Improving Protein Quantification with SERS Superspectra and Machine Learning.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative protein analysis by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) remains challenging due to weak and heterogeneous protein adsorption on plasmonic surfaces. Here, we introduce a superspectra-guided SERS framework that leverages chemically distinct interaction environments to enhance quantitative performance. Silver nanorod (AgNR) substrates were functionalized with cysteamine (CM), cysteine (CN), and 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH), together with unmodified (B) AgNRs, to create surfaces that probe complementary aspects of protein-surface interactions through charge- and chemistry-dependent binding. Using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein, we systematically constructed superspectra by concatenating SERS signals from all single-, pairwise-, triple-, and four-surface combinations and evaluated their performance using support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression (RFR). Our results reveal that superspectra must be constructed selectively: single-substrate spectra lack sufficient chemical diversity, and superspectra incorporating all four surfaces often degrade accuracy due to noninformative or conflicting features, particularly those introduced by MCH. In contrast, superspectra derived from complementary surface chemistries, especially the CM&CN pair or the B&CM&CN triplet, yield markedly improved quantitative predictions. RFR consistently outperformed SVR, demonstrating superior robustness for integrating chemically heterogeneous spectral inputs. This work establishes, for the first time, design principles for constructing effective superspectra for protein SERS and highlights the importance of analyte-surface interaction complementarity in enabling accurate, scalable protein quantification.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.