ArticleGlobal heart2026
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Systems of Care in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Article in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening, time-sensitive emergency. Cardiovascular diseases, including STEMI, are increasing on the African continent. Improving optimal outcomes for these patients requires a system-wide approach as the existing literature is unclear. Objectives: To describe and summarise the African literature on STEMI Systems of Care (STEMI SOC). Methods: This scoping review was designed following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An a priori search strategy was applied to EbscoHost, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Results: A total of 671 articles were identified. Following the exclusion of 619 articles, 52 articles were eligible for inclusion. STEMI patients in Africa are generally younger than their Western counterparts, present late to healthcare facilities, have insufficient healthcare insurance, and are non-adherent to discharge medication. Emergency medical services are lacking, there is a shortage of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities, and emergency departments are disorganised. STEMI reperfusion times are delayed, data collection and quality assurance initiatives are inadequate, and STEMI referral networks and registries are underdeveloped. In addition, there is a deficiency of ECG and telemetry, a shortage of healthcare workers, a lack of adherence to guideline-recommended therapy, and a perceived hesitancy of medical personnel to administer fibrinolytics. These findings suggest a need for more clinical education. Conclusion: A myriad of barriers, as well as potential facilitators in the implementation of these networks, have been reported in this scoping review. The coordination and introduction of a STEMI SOC in African settings potentially holds great advantages, as has been witnessed in other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.