Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727253›Full record

Review3 Biotech2026

Modern plant stress adaptation: integrating defense, nanotechnology and genetics.

Meenakshi, Komal, Arun Sharma, Sudharshan Prabhu, Shikha Awasthi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meenakshi *Department of Botany, Career Point University, Kota, Rajasthan India.
Komal *Department of Chemistry, School of Physical and Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007 Rajasthan India.
Arun SharmaDepartment of Chemistry, Career Point University, Kota, Rajasthan India.
Sudharshan PrabhuDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, 576104 Manipal, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0001-9267-4085
Shikha AwasthiJagran School of Pharmacy, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, 462044 Madhya Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review critically analyses plant adaptive responses to biotic and abiotic stress, with a focus on recent advancements in molecular defense pathways, emerging nanotechnology approaches and CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing strategies. We critically reviewed structural, physiological, biochemical and genetic adaptations. Key regulatory processes include phytohormonal regulation, antioxidants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling and stress-response gene networks are explored along with advances in nanotechnology-based strategies and CRISPR/Cas genome editing. A comparative evaluation of conventional breeding, molecular breeding, and genome-editing approaches highlights the advantages of CRISPR/Cas systems, particularly their precision, efficiency and ability to generate targeted phenotypic changes. In parallel, nanomaterials have shown promise in improved nutrient delivery, protecting cellular structures and enhancing genome-editing efficiency under stress conditions. By integrating nanotechnology and genome-editing approaches with traditional agricultural practices, it may be possible to enhance plant resilience, sustain crop productivity and reduce reliance on chemical inputs. Overall, this review provides a cohesive perspective on how these technologies can be combined to support future crop improvement efforts to tackle climate-induced agricultural challenges.

Indexed as

CRISPRGenetic mechanisms & antioxidant modulationPlant immunityROS signaling

Identifiers

PMID41727253
PMCPMC12923703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.