Review3 Biotech2026
Modern plant stress adaptation: integrating defense, nanotechnology and genetics.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle-Induced Cross-Tolerance: A Review of Mechanisms for Concurrent Biotic and Abiotic Stress Mitigation in Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review critically analyses plant adaptive responses to biotic and abiotic stress, with a focus on recent advancements in molecular defense pathways, emerging nanotechnology approaches and CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing strategies. We critically reviewed structural, physiological, biochemical and genetic adaptations. Key regulatory processes include phytohormonal regulation, antioxidants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling and stress-response gene networks are explored along with advances in nanotechnology-based strategies and CRISPR/Cas genome editing. A comparative evaluation of conventional breeding, molecular breeding, and genome-editing approaches highlights the advantages of CRISPR/Cas systems, particularly their precision, efficiency and ability to generate targeted phenotypic changes. In parallel, nanomaterials have shown promise in improved nutrient delivery, protecting cellular structures and enhancing genome-editing efficiency under stress conditions. By integrating nanotechnology and genome-editing approaches with traditional agricultural practices, it may be possible to enhance plant resilience, sustain crop productivity and reduce reliance on chemical inputs. Overall, this review provides a cohesive perspective on how these technologies can be combined to support future crop improvement efforts to tackle climate-induced agricultural challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.