ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Evolution and contemporary landscape of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia management guidelines: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical, economic, and organisational impact of the novel AAP 2022 neonatal hyperbilirubinemia guidelines in an Italian third-level neonatology unit.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, affecting over 60% of term and 80% of preterm infants globally, remains a significant public health challenge due to the persistent risk of kernicterus despite effective management strategies. This narrative review summarizes global clinical practice guidelines to describe the evolution and current landscape of management, highlighting the disparity between evidence-based consensus and local adaptation. While universal principles such as early hyperbilirubinemia screening, phototherapy as the first-line treatment, and post-discharge follow-up are widely endorsed, substantial disparities exist in implementation-particularly between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)-driven by differences in healthcare resources, sociocultural perceptions, and technological access. The 2025 Chinese guideline is an integrated model combining risk-stratified screening, locally derived hour-specific nomograms, online follow-up, and family engagement, offering a scalable framework for LMICs. Looking ahead, global harmonization may require a dual-layered guideline structure, affordable technology dissemination, culturally adapted family support systems, and inclusion of hyperbilirubinemia metrics in national health performance evaluations to achieve equitable and effective care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.