ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Comparing Neural Networks and Naive Bayes in the Prediction of Drug Gene Interactions of Type 4 Collagenase for Gingival Epithelialization.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing Neural Networks and Naive Bayes in the Prediction of Drug Gene Interactions of Type 4 Collagenase for Gingival Epithelialization.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the predictive abilities of neural networks and Naive Bayes in forecasting drug-gene interactions of type 4 collagenase in gingival epithelialization. Materials and Methods: This study examines drug-gene interactions in type 4 collagen using a dataset encompassing drugs, genes, biochemical activity, mode of action, and molecular activity. Data normalization and handling of missing values are conducted to minimize the influence of larger variables. Machine learning algorithms such as neural networks and Naïve Bayes forecast or categorize drug-gene interactions. The neural network architecture, featuring 10 hidden layers, the ReLU activation function, the Adam optimizer, regularization, and a maximum of 100 iterations, is adept at solving complex problems. Results: Naive Bayes demonstrates a high area under the curve of 0.995 and notable classification accuracy (CA), but registers low overall accuracy and F1 score. It outperforms the Neural Network model in accuracy, precision, F1 score, and recall, but exhibits low specificity, potentially leading to elevated false-positive rates. Conclusion: Predictions of drug-gene interactions for type 4 collagen hold promise for understanding biological pathways, identifying drug targets, designing targeted therapies, understanding disease mechanisms, and facilitating personalized medicine. The predictive models employed provide potential applications in personalized medicine, facilitating targeted therapies and disease management strategies. By elucidating biological pathways and drug targets, this research holds promise for advancing clinical interventions and improving patient outcomes in oral health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.