ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
UAV multispectral sensing and data-driven modeling for precision onion yield prediction.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted remote sensing with the Internet of Things (IoT) and Internet of Everything (IoE) offers a robust platform for optimizing precision agriculture by capturing spatiotemporal variability in crop growth. In this context, the present study aimed to predict the bulb yield of rainy-season onion crops across four staggered planting dates using UAV-based multispectral imagery. Canopy reflectance mosaics acquired at key growth stages, along with vegetation indices (VIs), viz. NDVI, NDRE, SAVI, LAI, NORM2, and GNDVI, were extracted for yield modeling. Yield prediction models at three onion growth stages were developed and assessed using five machine learning algorithms: linear regression (lm), random forest (rf), support vector machine with radial kernel (svmRadial), gradient boosting (gbm), and elastic net regression (glmnet), with model training and evaluation performed using 10-fold cross-validation. Among these, random forest consistently outperformed the other models at all growth stages, showing promising results at the bulb development stage, with a training R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.