ArticleBrain communications2026
Assessment of dynamic cerebral blood flow changes during cognitive tasks in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to quantify the variability of cortical blood flow during cognitive load as an indicator of disease-related changes in cerebral capillary blood flow intermittency in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. The regulation of cerebral blood flow in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex under cognitive load was examined using high-resolution functional near-infrared spectroscopy in 36 subjects including 12 patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and two control groups [12 coronary artery disease patients matched for age and 12 young healthy individuals (CTRL)]. To induce cognitive load, a Flanker task and an N-back task were employed. The structure of temporal variability of local blood flow regulation was assessed using sample entropy at 17 channels spanning both brain hemispheres. The spatial variability of the regional blood flow pattern was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) from sample entropies across all channels. Results revealed a notable discrepancy in that patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome exhibited reduced temporal variability (lower sample entropy) but elevated spatial variability (higher CV) in comparison to coronary artery disease patients during cognitive load (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.