Evidence mapPaperPMID 41728281Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

An LLM-assisted framework for accelerated and verifiable clinical hypothesis testing from electronic health records.

Nayoon Gim, In Gim, Yu Jiang, Yuka Kihara, Marian Blazes, Yue Wu, Cecilia S Lee, Aaron Y Lee

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nayoon GimDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-7452
In GimDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-9526
Yu JiangJohn F. Hardesty Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2914-8300
Yuka KiharaJohn F. Hardesty Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-7222
Marian BlazesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-5238
Yue WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2917-5862
Cecilia S LeeJohn F. Hardesty Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-7213
Aaron Y LeeJohn F. Hardesty Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7452-1648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquiring insights from electronic health records (EHRs) is slowed by manual analytical workflows that limit scalability and reproducibility. We present LATCH (LLM-Assisted Testing of Clinical Hypotheses), an agentic framework that converts natural language clinical hypotheses into fully auditable analyses on structured EHR data. LATCH integrates LLM-assisted semantic layers with deterministic execution pipelines to automate cohort construction, statistical analysis, and result reporting, while isolating patient-level data from LLM-involved steps. Using diabetes as a model disease, LATCH reproduced findings from 20 published studies within 3-15 minutes per study. Beyond replication, LATCH enabled study extensions and new insight generation through simple natural language hypothesis modifications. We demonstrated LATCH across 102 hypothesis tests spanning reproduction, extension, and insight generation. We systematically stress-tested LATCH to characterize its limitations and operational boundaries. LATCH provides a scalable framework for reproducible real-world evidence generation, reducing analytical bottlenecks and improving reliability of AI-assisted biomedical discovery while preserving human oversight.

Identifiers

PMID41728281
PMCPMC12919150

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.