ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
An LLM-assisted framework for accelerated and verifiable clinical hypothesis testing from electronic health records.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquiring insights from electronic health records (EHRs) is slowed by manual analytical workflows that limit scalability and reproducibility. We present LATCH (LLM-Assisted Testing of Clinical Hypotheses), an agentic framework that converts natural language clinical hypotheses into fully auditable analyses on structured EHR data. LATCH integrates LLM-assisted semantic layers with deterministic execution pipelines to automate cohort construction, statistical analysis, and result reporting, while isolating patient-level data from LLM-involved steps. Using diabetes as a model disease, LATCH reproduced findings from 20 published studies within 3-15 minutes per study. Beyond replication, LATCH enabled study extensions and new insight generation through simple natural language hypothesis modifications. We demonstrated LATCH across 102 hypothesis tests spanning reproduction, extension, and insight generation. We systematically stress-tested LATCH to characterize its limitations and operational boundaries. LATCH provides a scalable framework for reproducible real-world evidence generation, reducing analytical bottlenecks and improving reliability of AI-assisted biomedical discovery while preserving human oversight.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.