ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Portal Vein Diameter on Routine Clinical CT: Establishing Normals and Disease Associations.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Portal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, leads to significant morbidity and mortality. While portal vein diameter measured on imaging has long been proposed as a non-invasive marker of portal hypertension, normative CT-based reference values and population-level associations remain incompletely characterized. Here, we aim to define contemporary reference values for portal vein diameter on clinically obtained CT and evaluate its associations with demographic, clinical, and imaging factors, as well as its diagnostic performance for portal hypertension. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 20,225 clinically obtained CT scans at a single academic medical center. The main portal vein was automatically segmented using Total Segmentator, and maximum diameter extracted using the Vascular Modeling Toolkit. Associations with demographic and imaging factors were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models; prevalent liver disease and portal hypertension using logistic regression; risk of incident ascites and esophageal varices among participants with liver disease using Cox regression; and invasive hepatic venous pressures using correlation analysis and linear regression. Results: The mean portal vein diameter was 12.4 mm (95% CI, 12.37-12.45). Larger diameter was independently associated with male sex (+1.4 mm), higher BMI (+0.11 mm/kg/m Conclusion: In this large, EHR-linked imaging cohort, the mean portal vein diameter on CT was 12.4 mm and varied with demographic and imaging factors. Larger diameter was associated with liver disease, portal hypertension, and subsequent development of varices and ascites, supporting use of portal vein diameter as a pragmatic screening or enrichment tool within multimodal clinical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.