ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Bridging the Genomic Equity Gap with Context-Enhanced Risk Stratification in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PGS) show promise for disease risk stratification but suffer from limited portability across populations. American Indians face a disproportionate burden of cardiovascular disease yet remain significantly underrepresented in genomic research, limiting equitable access to precision medicine. Here, we evaluate whether integrating specific lifestyle and clinical context variables with PGS enhances risk prediction for cardiometabolic traits in 424,622 European from UK Biobank (UKB) and 3,157 American Indian populations from the Strong Heart Study (SHS). By comparing genetics-only models to full models incorporating context variables and gene-context interactions across blood pressure traits, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke, we found that the integration of context variables significantly improved prediction accuracy in both cohorts. Notably, for American Indian participants, the new model incorporating context and genetic interactions significantly improved model discrimination for CHD compared to an established clinical risk model. These findings suggest that modeling the interplay between inherited risk and modifiable factors can recover predictive power loss due to imperfect PGS transferability, offering a viable pathway toward more equitable and effective precision medicine for under-represented populations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.