Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728323›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Arrhythmia Detection Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Luiz Filipe Torres de Alencar, Gabriel Fontenele Ximenes, Marina de Andrade Norões Bezerra, Leonardo Brito de Souza, Nicole Aires Perazolo, João Pedro Teixeira Bentes Monteiro, Pedro Jorge Pires Viana, Mateus Paiva Marques Feitosa, Jefferson Luís Vieira, Shaan Khurshid

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luiz Filipe Torres de AlencarDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-5391-8402
Gabriel Fontenele XimenesDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Marina de Andrade Norões BezerraDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Leonardo Brito de SouzaDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Nicole Aires PerazoloDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-1977-3582
João Pedro Teixeira Bentes MonteiroDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Pedro Jorge Pires VianaDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Mateus Paiva Marques FeitosaDepartment of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Jefferson Luís VieiraHospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5982-8847
Shaan KhurshidCardiovascular Research Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2840-4539

Funding

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning and decision analysis to improve atrial fibrillation risk estimationK23HL169839 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Shaan Khurshid · 2023 to 2026
$860k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL169839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for interpreting 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy for arrhythmia detection. However, published studies vary widely in methodology and validation strategy, warranting a quantitative synthesis of diagnostic performance. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA-DTA 2018 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251027264). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through September 2025 without language restrictions. Studies evaluating AI algorithms for arrhythmia detection using 12-lead ECGs were included. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted. Pooled estimates were generated using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2, and the certainty of evidence was quantified using GRADE. Results: 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing over 5.5 million ECGs. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for AI-based arrhythmia detection were 94.0% (95% CI 90.8-96.2; I Conclusions: AI models applied to 12-lead ECGs demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance for arrhythmia detection. Findings support potential integration into clinical workflows, particularly in settings with limited cardiology expertise. Given substantial heterogeneity, standardized datasets and multicenter prospective validation are essential to ensure effective and equitable implementation.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaartificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic accuracyelectrocardiographymeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41728323
PMCPMC12919118

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.