ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Augmenting Electronic Health Records for Adverse Event Detection.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Adverse events (AEs) resulting from medical interventions are significant contributors to patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Prediction of these events using electronic health records (EHRs) can facilitate timely clinical interventions. However, effective prediction remains challenging due to severe class imbalance, missing labels, and the complexity of EHR records. Classical machine learning approaches frequently underperform due to insufficient representation of minority adverse event classes and limited capacity to capture interactions among patient demographics, administered medications, and associated complications. Methods: We introduce TASER-AE, a novel data augmentation pipeline tailored for structured EHR data, coupled with transformer-based classification. TASER-AE addresses these issues through an NLP-inspired data augmentation framework adapted for EHR, enabling effective minority-class representation in sparse and imbalanced clinical datasets. The augmented records produced by TASER-AE alleviate class imbalance by enriching the representation of minority adverse event classes, which enhances the robustness and predictive performance of the classifier. Results: TASER-AE yields minority-class F1 scores up to 0.70, substantially surpassing classical machine-learning baselines and prior augmentation methods across multiple adverse event tasks. Experiments conducted on two distinct EHR datasets confirm TASER-AE's ability to substantially improve adverse event detection performance. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the potential of structured, NLP-inspired augmentation methods to overcome data limitations in clinical predictive modeling, ultimately contributing to improved patient safety outcomes. TASER-AE is available at https://github.com/Kingsford-Group/taserae.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.