ReviewCureus2026
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Orforglipron Doses in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigation into the efficacy and safety profile of oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of orforglipron in obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Comparative Positioning of Orforglipron Among Selected GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Benchmarks: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- SGLT2 Inhibitors in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity represent major global health challenges. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as effective treatments for both conditions, providing significant glycemic control and weight-reduction benefits. Orforglipron is an investigational, oral, non-peptide GLP-1RA that does not require complex absorption enhancers or dosing restrictions. Preclinical and early clinical studies have demonstrated promising results in glycemic control and weight reduction. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various orforglipron doses in improving glycemic control and reducing body weight. We conducted a search across five databases. A frequentist network meta-analysis with random-effects models was performed using MetaInsight (version 3.14) to analyze randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing orforglipron with placebo in patients with obesity or diabetes. Efficacy outcomes (HbA1c, body weight, BMI, lipid profile, blood pressure) were reported as mean differences, and safety outcomes (adverse events) as risk ratios, with 95% CIs. Five RCTs involving multiple orforglipron doses (3-45 mg) demonstrated that higher doses, particularly 45 mg, significantly reduced BMI (MD = -3.52 kg/m²), body weight (MD = -9.34%), waist circumference (MD = -7.19 cm), HbA1c (MD = -1.33%), triglycerides (MD = -15.31% for 36 mg), and blood pressure compared to placebo. All doses showed higher rates of total adverse events and treatment discontinuation than placebo, while serious adverse events and specific gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia) were lower than placebo. Orforglipron is particularly suitable for patients preferring oral therapy over injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists. Orforglipron demonstrated significant dose-dependent improvements in patients with obesity (with or without comorbidities) and T2DM, with higher doses (36-45 mg) showing greater efficacy for weight loss and glycemic control, though at the cost of increased treatment discontinuation. Mid-range doses (24-36 mg) may be better suited for patients prioritizing lipid management and blood pressure control while seeking improved tolerability with a lower discontinuation risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.