ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2026
Analysis of the Matrix Metalloproteinases Family Profile in Gastric Cancer Suggests Key Matrix Metalloproteinases for Tumor Development and Their Clinical Impact.
Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Analysis of the Matrix Metalloproteinases Family Profile in Gastric Cancer Suggests Key Matrix Metalloproteinases for Tumor Development and Their Clinical Impact.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common type worldwide, representing a public health problem. Among the genes related to this tumorigenesis, the family of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), essential regulators of the extracellular matrix (ECM), stand out for their involvement in the development and progression of GC. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate MMP gene expression variation, its relationship with clinicopathological factors and its transcriptome-wide associations. To this end, RNAseq, correlation network, and biological pathway enrichment analyses were performed on tumor samples from GC and peritumoral samples from patients treated at a reference center in the Northern region of Brazil. Among the 22 investigated MMPs, seven genes (MMP2, MMP3, MMP10, MMP12, MMP14, MMP15, and MMP16) were upregulated in cancer, while MMP8 was downregulated. Increased expression of seven of the eight differentially expressed MMPs was found in early stages of the disease compared to Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage IV. MMP16 showed higher expression in the diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma. An increased expression of MMP10 was observed in the EBV/TCGA group. A significant reduction in survival was noticed in those patients with lower expression of MMP8, MMP12, and MMP14. Transcriptomic correlation analyses demonstrated that differentially expressed MMPs interact with genes likely involved in cell adhesion, ECM organization, and immune response, such as COL1A2, CDH11, KIRREL1, PPP1R14D, CEACAM8, ZNF423, and PRRX1. The enrichment of biological pathways suggests involvement in processes such as ECM organization, collagen and proteoglycan degradation, suggesting that these genes possibly are involved in carcinogenic dynamics, supporting the role of MMPs in tumor ECM reorganization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.