Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729174›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2026

Handling incomplete outcomes and covariates in cluster-randomized trials: doubly robust estimation, efficiency considerations, and sensitivity analysis.

Bingkai Wang, Fan Li, Rui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bingkai WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-2336
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893
Rui WangDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-193X

Funding

Improving the design and statistical analysis of cluster-randomized trials on tropical infectious diseasesR00AI173395 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, BINGKAI · 2024 to 2025
$497k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNIAID NIH HHS R00 AI173395NIH HHS R00AI173395Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2022C2-27676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cluster-randomized trials (CRTs), missing data can occur in various ways, including missing values in outcomes and baseline covariates at the individual or cluster level, or completely missing information for non-participants. Among the various types of missing data in CRTs, missing outcomes have attracted the most attention. However, no existing methods simultaneously address all aforementioned types of missing data in CRTs. To fill in this gap, we propose a doubly robust estimator for the average treatment effect on a variety of effect measure scales. The proposed estimator simultaneously handles missing outcomes under missingness at random, missing covariates without constraining the missingness mechanism, and missing cluster-population sizes via a uniform sampling mechanism. Furthermore, we detail key considerations to improve precision by specifying the optimal weights, leveraging machine learning, and modeling the treatment assignment mechanism. Finally, to evaluate the impact of violating missing data assumptions, we contribute a new sensitivity analysis framework tailored to CRTs. We assess the performance of the proposed methods through simulations and illustrate their use in a real data application.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMachine Learningcluster-randomized trialdouble robustnessmachine learningmissing datamodel misspecificationrestricted missing at randomsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41729174
PMCPMC13108325

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.