Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729335›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular histology2026

Anti-hyperplastic effects of Acmella oleracea flower and leaf extracts in prostate cell lines and in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Edvaldo Mendes Silva, Cínthia Rio Branco da Silva, Janaína Ribeiro Costa, Aline Siqueira-Berti, Hericles Mesquita Campos, Paulo César Ghedini, Sebastião Roberto Taboga, Hernandes F Carvalho, Mayara Tânia Pinheiro, Francisco Fábio Oliveira de Sousa and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Edvaldo Mendes SilvaLaboratory of Microscopy Applied to Reproduction, Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Cínthia Rio Branco da SilvaLaboratory of Microscopy Applied to Reproduction, Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Janaína Ribeiro CostaLaboratory of Microscopy Applied to Reproduction, Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Aline Siqueira-BertiDepartment of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Hericles Mesquita CamposLaboratory of Molecular and Biochemistry Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Paulo César GhediniLaboratory of Molecular and Biochemistry Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Sebastião Roberto TabogaLaboratory of Microscopy and Microanalysis, Department of Biology, University Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Rua Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15054000, Brazil.
Hernandes F CarvalhoDepartment of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Mayara Tânia PinheiroLaboratory of Biotechnology in Natural Products, Department of Biological and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Francisco Fábio Oliveira de SousaLaboratory of Quality Control, Bromatology and Microbiology, Department of Biological and Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Francinaldo Sarges BragaAtomic Absorption and Prospecting Laboratory, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Roberto Messias BezerraAtomic Absorption and Prospecting Laboratory, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Elizabeth Pereira MendesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Manoel Francisco BiancardiLaboratory of Microscopy Applied to Reproduction, Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil.
Fernanda Cristina Alcantara Dos SantosLaboratory of Microscopy Applied to Reproduction, Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74001970, Brazil. fernanda_alcantara@ufg.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent age-associated disorder and a leading cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men worldwide. Given the limitations of current therapies, there is increasing interest in phytotherapeutic compounds as sources of biologically active agents. Acmella oleracea, a medicinal plant rich in the alkamide spilanthol, has been traditionally associated with urogenital effects; however, the biological impact of distinct plant organs on prostate hyperplasia remains poorly defined. In this study, we investigated the effects of flower (A.Fl) and leaf (A.Le) extracts of A. oleracea using human prostate cell lines (RWPE-1 and PC-3) and a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model of BPH. In vitro analyses included cell viability assays and immunofluorescence for androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). In vivo, SHR were treated orally with A.Fl or A.Le (100 mg/kg/day for 21 days), followed by morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and oxidative stress analyses of the ventral prostate. A.Fl displayed lower cytotoxicity than A.Le in both prostate cell lines and preferentially increased ERα immunoreactivity, whereas A.Le more strongly modulated AR without affecting cell proliferation. In SHR, both extracts attenuated prostatic hyperplasia, although A.Fl produced a more pronounced reduction in epithelial proliferation and stromal remodeling. These effects occurred independently of changes in systemic blood pressure or antioxidant activity. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that flower and leaf extracts of A. oleracea exert distinct biological and endocrine-modulatory effects on prostate tissue. The present data provide experimental evidence that different plant organs differentially influence epithelial-stromal dynamics and steroid receptor signaling in prostatic hyperplasia, supporting further mechanistic and translational investigations.

Indexed as

FlowersPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesProstateProstatic HyperplasiaAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalHumansMaleOxidative StressRatsRats, Inbred SHRReceptors, AndrogenPlant ExtractsReceptors, AndrogenEndocrine modulationHypertensionMorphologyPC-3 cellsProstatic hyperplasiaRWPE-1 cells

Identifiers

PMID41729335
PMCPMC12929279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.