ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Dyspepsia Care as a Missed Gateway to Gastric Cancer Prevention in High-Risk U.S. Populations.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyspepsia is among the most common gastrointestinal complaints, affecting nearly one in five adults annually. Guidelines diverge in their recommendations: the American College of Gastroenterology and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology endorse Helicobacter pylori "test-and-treat" for patients under 60 years, with upper endoscopy for those aged 60 and above or with alarm features. By contrast, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy advises endoscopy for patients with new-onset dyspepsia beginning at age ≥ 50, even without alarm features. The British Society of Gastroenterology emphasizes risk context, recommending earlier endoscopy (age > 40 years) for individuals from regions with a high incidence of gastric cancer or with a family history of gastric cancer. These differences underscore uncertainty around age thresholds and the limitations of uniform, age-based strategies. In the United States, where several high-risk populations carry disproportionately elevated gastric cancer risk, a tailored, ethnicity- and life-course-informed approach is warranted. Embedding ancestry, nativity, and family history into dyspepsia evaluation would reframe H. pylori eradication as primary prevention and lower thresholds for endoscopy in high-risk groups. Such a strategy would rationalize endoscopy use, advance equity, and reduce preventable deaths. Reframing dyspepsia as an opportunity for prevention is both a clinical and equity imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729425What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.