Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729435›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2026

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A 16-Week Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Compared with Upadacitinib and Baricitinib.

Ho Eun Gwag, Minjung Park, So Yun Park, Narang Hong, Seok Jae Heo, Hye Jung Jung, Mi Youn Park, Yu Sung Choi, Jiyoung Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ho Eun GwagDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
Minjung ParkDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
So Yun ParkDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
Narang HongDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
Seok Jae HeoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Jung JungDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
Mi Youn ParkDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea.
Yu Sung ChoiDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Soonchunyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Jiyoung AhnDepartment of Dermatology, National Medical Center, 245 Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04564, Korea. jiyoung.ahn@nmc.or.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6766-9978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAbrocitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Although several real-world studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of abrocitinib, most have been limited by small sample sizes, and there are limited data on South Korean patients with AD. In addition, real-world comparative data across oral JAK inhibitors for AD remain limited.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study at the National Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD (baseline EASI ≥ 7) who initiated abrocitinib between September 2022 and April 2024 were included in the primary cohort; additional cohorts treated with upadacitinib or baricitinib during predefined periods were analyzed for between-drug comparisons. Efficacy was assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 16 using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, and laboratory tests.

resultsOf the 66 patients enrolled, 57 patients completed 16 weeks of abrocitinib treatment in the analysis. The mean EASI score significantly decreased after 16 weeks. At week 16, 94.4%, 72.2%, and 25.9% of patients with AD achieved EASI-50, -75, and -90, respectively. Additionally, of the 21 patients who had previously experienced biologics or other JAK inhibitors, 95.5%, 72.7%, and 22.7% achieved EASI-50, -75, and -90, respectively. Further analysis of the EASI breakdown showed improvements of more than 80% across all body regions, with the lower extremities showing the greatest reduction (87.5%) and lichenification exhibiting the highest symptom improvement (89.7%). In descriptive, unadjusted comparisons, abrocitinib showed numerically higher EASI-50 and EASI-75 response rates at week 16 than upadacitinib and baricitinib. Acne was the most frequent adverse event with abrocitinib (43.9%), followed by urticaria (24.6%) and herpes simplex infection (12.3%); no dose reductions or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred.

conclusionAbrocitinib demonstrates real-world efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe AD, including patients with inadequate responses to other dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, including those with prior exposure to biologics or other JAK inhibitors.

Indexed as

AbrocitinibAtopic dermatitisJAK inhibitorReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID41729435
PMCPMC13013864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.