ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A 16-Week Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Compared with Upadacitinib and Baricitinib.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abrocitinib Achieves Early and Complete/Near-Complete Skin Clearance Plus Itch-Free State in Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Pooled Post Hoc Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Atopic Dermatitis Beyond the Skin Barrier: Precision Medicine Approaches to Immunological Profiling and Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib Versus Abrocitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of 200 mg abrocitinib initiation in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAbrocitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Although several real-world studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of abrocitinib, most have been limited by small sample sizes, and there are limited data on South Korean patients with AD. In addition, real-world comparative data across oral JAK inhibitors for AD remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study at the National Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD (baseline EASI ≥ 7) who initiated abrocitinib between September 2022 and April 2024 were included in the primary cohort; additional cohorts treated with upadacitinib or baricitinib during predefined periods were analyzed for between-drug comparisons. Efficacy was assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 16 using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, and laboratory tests.
resultsOf the 66 patients enrolled, 57 patients completed 16 weeks of abrocitinib treatment in the analysis. The mean EASI score significantly decreased after 16 weeks. At week 16, 94.4%, 72.2%, and 25.9% of patients with AD achieved EASI-50, -75, and -90, respectively. Additionally, of the 21 patients who had previously experienced biologics or other JAK inhibitors, 95.5%, 72.7%, and 22.7% achieved EASI-50, -75, and -90, respectively. Further analysis of the EASI breakdown showed improvements of more than 80% across all body regions, with the lower extremities showing the greatest reduction (87.5%) and lichenification exhibiting the highest symptom improvement (89.7%). In descriptive, unadjusted comparisons, abrocitinib showed numerically higher EASI-50 and EASI-75 response rates at week 16 than upadacitinib and baricitinib. Acne was the most frequent adverse event with abrocitinib (43.9%), followed by urticaria (24.6%) and herpes simplex infection (12.3%); no dose reductions or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred.
conclusionAbrocitinib demonstrates real-world efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe AD, including patients with inadequate responses to other dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, including those with prior exposure to biologics or other JAK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.