ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Associations Between Gambling Motives and More Severe Gambling Disorder - Does Gender Matter?
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gambling Disorder (GD) is a behavioural addiction with complex, detrimental psychological, economic, and social consequences. Previous research has examined gender differences in the prevalence of distinct gambling motives and has linked gambling motives to at-risk behaviour. Whether motives affect probabilities of transition to higher GD severity levels differently in males and females remains unclear. Using an online self-test, we assessed the prevalence distinct GD severity levels according to the DSM-5 criteria and gambling motives with items addressing domains of the "Gambling Motives Questionnaire - Financial" (GFQ-F). Associations between motives and GD severity at three transition points (no GD to mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe GD) were analysed using age-adjusted logistic adjacent category regression models. Interaction terms (motive*gender) were examined to detect gender-specific "effects". Furthermore gender-stratified models were run. No significant gender*motive interactions emerged. In the total sample, a transition to a higher GD severity level was predicted by: "(to) Forget worries", "When depressed," and "(to) Earn money" at each transition point; "Thrill" and "Stress" at the first two points, and "Boredom" at the first point. In males, the results were nearly identical. In females only "Thrill", "Boredom", and "(to) Earn money" were predictive at the first transition point. Given the prevalence of coping motives in females and the consistent detrimental "effect" of coping and financial motives in males, these motives should be prioritized in treatment and support offers for both genders. For prevention, strategies targeting enhancement motives may be particularly effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729485What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.