ArticleHepatology communications2026
Defining the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) research agenda: A Delphi consensus project.
Article in Hepatology communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Material economic hardships are associated with second-year hospitalizations after pediatric liver transplantation: Results from the SOCIAL-Tx study.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite major advances in surgical and medical management, only one-third of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients remain morbidity-free at 10 years. The Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) published a research agenda over 10 years ago, and much progress has been made since then. An updated consensus-driven SPLIT research agenda could guide future research and funding priorities. We aimed to identify and prioritize key research needs across the continuum of pediatric LT care using a modified Delphi consensus approach.
methodsWe conducted a three-round modified Delphi process among SPLIT members. In round 1, participants submitted open-ended research priorities. In round 2, the Steering Committee synthesized these into 156 unique statements for rating. The third and final round included revision and rerating of 42 statements. Consensus was defined as a median importance rating ≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale.
resultsSixty-nine multidisciplinary experts participated in round 1, with <30% attrition across rounds. The panel identified 46 high-priority research topics, organized into 7 domains: (1) end-stage disease and waitlist management; (2) transplant access, allocation, and organ utilization; (3) perioperative management; (4) immunosuppression management; (5) transplant complications; (6) long-term health and transition to adulthood; and (7) special populations. Highest-ranked research priorities included (1) developing an updated LT waitlist allocation scoring tool, (2) identifying novel biomarkers to guide immunosuppression minimization/withdrawal, and (3) developing new organ preservation strategies to increase the availability of high-quality organs for pediatric LT candidates.
conclusionsSPLIT members identified 46 consensus research priorities that define the next frontier of pediatric LT research and provide a roadmap for investigators, funders, and health systems to improve survival and lifelong health in children after LT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.