ArticleBMJ open2026
Association between lifestyle changes and metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study in middle-aged Koreans.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine whether certain lifestyle factors, specifically alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, sleep duration and sleep quality, are associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and to assess how changes in lifestyle behaviours over time influence MetS prevalence in the middle-aged Korean population.
designCommunity-based, prospective cohort study.
settingSouth Korea, baseline in 2017-2019 and follow-up in 2020-2022.
participantsThe study included 1436 adult individuals aged ≥30-59 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of MetS at follow-up, determined according to established diagnostic criteria. Secondary outcomes included the association between MetS and five key lifestyle factors: alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, sleep quality and sleep duration. Lifestyle changes were categorised into four groups based on stability between baseline and follow-up assessments. Outcome measures remained consistent with the study's initial protocol, with no modifications to the planned variables or measured criteria.
resultsThe prevalence of MetS increased from 15.3% at baseline to 19.6% at follow-up. At follow-up, insufficient physical activity (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92) and poor sleep quality (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.84) were significantly associated with MetS. Among lifestyle change patterns, long-term unhealthy physical activity (OR=1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.39) and sleep quality (OR=1.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.24) behaviours were associated with an increased risk of MetS. Poisson regression analyses of incident cases showed that only unfavourable changes in sleep duration were significantly associated with incident MetS (rate ratios=1.74, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.95). However, no significant associations were observed for other lifestyle change patterns, including behaviours that improved or worsened over time, and no meaningful associations were identified for non-significant lifestyle factors, such as smoking and alcohol consumption.
conclusionsThe prevalence of MetS was associated not only with individual lifestyle factors but also with long-term patterns of unhealthy behaviours, with persistent shortage of physical activity, poor sleep quality and inadequate sleep duration identified as significant contributors to increased MetS risk. Future research should explore a broader range of risk factors over longer follow-up periods to better understand the long-term impact of lifestyle modifications on MetS development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.