ArticleScientific reports2026
FaceScanPaliGemma multi-agent vision language models for facial attribute recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies for recognizing facial attributes such as race, gender, age, and emotion from images of human faces have several applications, including personalized advertising, sentiment analysis, and the study of demographic trends and social behaviors. Analyzing face images and facial expressions presents several challenges due to the complexity of human facial attributes and the diversity in representation. While numerous attempts have been made to improve facial attribute classification performance, there remains a strong demand for enhanced accuracy. In this paper, we propose "FaceScanPaliGemma," a multi-agent vision language model (VLM) system consisting of four fine-tuned Google PaliGemma models, each specialized for a specific facial attribute classification. To evaluate the proposed solution, we used the public "FairFace" and "AffectNet" datasets. The results show high accuracy, reaching up to 81.1%, 95.8%, 80.0%, and 59.4% for race, gender, age group, and emotion classification, respectively, outperforming other VLMs such as OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, LLaVA, and Google PaliGemma under zero-shot evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.