Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effects of deload periods in resistance training on muscle hypertrophy and strength endurance in untrained young men using a randomized within subject design.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of deload periods implemented through reductions in weekly set volume and training frequency at the midpoint and endpoint of an 8-week resistance training (RT) program on muscle hypertrophy and strength-endurance in untrained individuals. 19 untrained young men participated in the study using a within-subject design. Each participant's legs and arms were randomly assigned to the continuous and deload training conditions. In the continuous condition, unilateral leg extension and biceps curl exercises were performed twice per week for 8 weeks (6-8 sets per exercise, 8-12RM). In the deload condition, a similar training program was followed; however, during weeks 4 and 8, the exercises were performed only once per week with 2 sets per exercise. Muscle thickness was measured with ultrasound, while strength-endurance was assessed with 10-repetition maximum (10RM) testing, pre- and post-intervention. Both conditions produced similar, statistically significant increases in quadriceps/biceps muscle thickness and 10RM (single exception: lateral 30%-deload, p = 0.073). No time × condition interactions were detected for muscle thickness or strength-endurance (p = 0.239-0.955); between-condition effects were small (ηp
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.